CognitiveScience Monday, October 6, 2003 . This is a SciScoop post by Ricky James
Dr Qazi Rahman, of the University of East London, said the reaction of the lesbian test subjects was closer to that which would be expected among straight men. The same was true among gay men, although to a lesser extent, in that their reaction was closer to that of women.
Dr Rahman said the results could affect the way society dealt with sexuality and issues of sexual orientation.
Along with Dr Veena Kumari and Dr Glenn Wilson of the Institute of Psychiatry, part of King’s College London, Dr Rahman claimed their study offered the first independent evidence of a non-learned, neurological basis for sexual orientation.
Using a technique called prepulse inhibition (PPI), the test subjects were unexpectedly startled by loud noises preceded by a quieter noise.
Using electrodes on the face just beneath the eye, Dr Rahman measured the strength of the involuntary eye-blink responses to the noises and compared them with those to a loud noise on its own – the lower the response, the stronger the level of inhibition.
Heterosexual men had a PPI of 40%, compared to 13% for heterosexual women. Lesbians had a PPI of 33% – significantly stronger that that of straight women. Gay men averaged a PPI of 32% – slightly lower than straight men.
Dr Rahman said: “The startle response is pre-conscious and cannot be learned. It is mediated by an ancient region of the brain called the limbic system which also controls sexual behaviour. This is very strong evidence that female sexual orientation at least may be ‘hard-wired’ in this region.”
SciScoop Science News is a forum for news, views and controversial conjectures. Please contact us if would like to submit a guest post.
5 Responses to Eye-blink Tests Show Sexuality Hardwired Before Birth
Anonymous
October 7th, 2003 at 8:58 am
I don’t suppose the “brilliant” Dr. Rahman stopped to think that maybe certain behavior choices we make after birth (what career we choose, what food we eat, where we go to school, if we go to school, how we relate to authority, etc.) actually can change the way our brains function. I could be a little off on this, but I have the impression that the way our brains work is a combination of the actual chemical balances (or imbalances) and the things we learn, and either can influence the other, but neither are solely responsible for making us “who we are”. The only real way to test this kind of thing would be to follow LARGE groups of test subjects from before birth through adulthood, not just 59 adults. This kind of “study” smacks more of sensationalism than scientific research.
deadcell
October 7th, 2003 at 9:38 pm
this sounds very plausable. As far as some other member saying that ,”where we live and how we were raised” has forgets the area of the brain we are discussing here…………
Anonymous
October 8th, 2003 at 10:31 am
“The startle response is pre-conscious and cannot be learned.”
Read the article!! The whole point of the study is that blink-reaction is not learnable, i.e. is not modifiable by “life-experience”.
However predilection and choice are different things, and I’m sure we’ve all heard about “shades of sexuality”. All the same, it is an interesting insight.
Anonymous
October 9th, 2003 at 10:36 am
There is an assumption that this response is not learnable. Where is the evidence to back up this conjecture?
Anonymous
October 16th, 2003 at 4:07 pm
Yes, lets not forget the area of the brain we are discussing here… one of the more mysterious ones. Actualy MOST of the brain is still pretty mysterious to modern science.
Plus, there has been no studies that this response is invariant throughout the life of someone.
It also is VERY interesting to note that homosexual men do not register the same as women, and homosexual women do not register as men. they are both kinda equivalent. Which could mean they are just more neutral emotionally. It does not neccessarily mean anything about their sexuality.
It would be more believable that this had a direct influence on sexual preference, if the figures were gender-reversed, in the case of homosexual preference. But they arent.