<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 1984 &quot;Press Your Luck&quot; Scandal Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-3-19-82554-1210.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-3-19-82554-1210.html</link>
	<description>Scooping up science news and dropping it on your desk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-3-19-82554-1210.html/comment-page-1#comment-2421</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=543#comment-2421</guid>
		<description>Is there anywhere I can get a video tape of old episodes of PYL???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there anywhere I can get a video tape of old episodes of PYL???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chad</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-3-19-82554-1210.html/comment-page-1#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 19:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=543#comment-655</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The part I like is that contestants appearing immediately after Larsen had also figured out the timing patterns, but couldn&#039;t use that knowledge because the network added an additional 16 patterns after Larsen&#039;s big win.
&lt;p&gt;Then there&#039;s the fact that he managed to lose his winnings in a bad investment, even before the show was cancelled. It goes to show that you can be technically smart but financially stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The part I like is that contestants appearing immediately after Larsen had also figured out the timing patterns, but couldn&#8217;t use that knowledge because the network added an additional 16 patterns after Larsen&#8217;s big win.
</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s the fact that he managed to lose his winnings in a bad investment, even before the show was cancelled. It goes to show that you can be technically smart but financially stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
