SciScoop Science News header image

Genetic Discrimination on the Horizon

Biology Tuesday, March 4, 2003 . This is a SciScoop post by Drog

  • Share/Bookmark

In a speech given at a meeting on genetic testing, Nobel Prize-winning scientist Sir Paul Nurse spoke out about the danger of genetic discrimination as individual genome sequencing showing susceptibility for diseases becomes routine in 20 years. Children may even be given genetic identity cards at birth. As Reuters reports, advances in genetics are expected to create a new era of personalized medicine and preventive treatments but they may also lead to discrimination by insurance companies and employers against people with genetic defects. Sound like a sci-fi movie you’ve seen?

“This issue is too important to be left to scientists and policy makers alone,” Nurse told participants at the meeting. “In the coming years, the public will be offered more and more opportunities to take genetic tests and peer into their genetic destinies, but legislation must keep pace with the technology and help shape a fair and equitable society. We need to be extremely careful how this technology is used to shape our society. We need to discuss what genetics can and can’t deliver and what sort of society we want as a result.”

6 Responses to Genetic Discrimination on the Horizon

Drog

March 4th, 2003 at 10:21 am

A related story about about how reprogenetics–the altering of specific genes–will bring about a new phase in human evolution can be found here.

Avatar

Alan Von Fan

March 4th, 2003 at 11:27 am

A serious concern. In the far future perhaps people of ‘inferior’ genetic backgrounds will not be allowed to breed. In the slightly nearer future it is possible that in some countries where intolerance is common and racial hatred is deep-rooted it may be that people with a specific ethnic background will die out. Of course this is a little far-fetched; we’ve had nuclear weapons for over fifty years and haven’t nuked the planet like everyone thought we would, but it could happen. And I’m sure a lot of people will be just fine with that as long as they get to say who is erased from the gene-pool.

Avatar

Machi

March 4th, 2003 at 12:02 pm

Scientific progress must include reflection of any benefit or detriment to humanity.

What kind of a future do we want to have?
What kind of a society?

My hope is that at some point a visionary will consider all sides and point out where the scientific community may be lacking. Science will lead to advancements only limited by our ingenuity and then it will be left to our humanity to implement them with true forethought.

Avatar

Anonymous

March 4th, 2003 at 1:08 pm

Not allowed to breed? Gimme a break. Please think for two seconds about what you just said. This is not the end of the world, and we have years of insightful commentary on totalitarianism by authors in the past, and enough intellectuals that the race has hope of survival.

Avatar

Alan Von Fan

March 4th, 2003 at 2:55 pm

Yeah, you’re probably right; a reminder that I shouldn’t just slam out a comment on the spur of the moment. What I meant to say really was more along the lines Machi followed. Just got a little carried away I guess, although I’m cynical enough to imagine someone TRYING to implement a scheme of ‘racial improvement’ using genetic libraries as a plan of approved citizens. As you say though, this isn’t the end of the world, and enough people know what’s what to keep most of the lunatics on a tight rein. Cheers!

Avatar

Anonymous

May 16th, 2003 at 11:33 am

Actually the Mayans predicted the world would end in ten years. They have correctly predicted every major astrnomical event and only been of by minutes

Avatar

Comment Form

About

SciScoop Science News is a forum for news, views and controversial conjectures. please contact us to submit a guest blog post idea to become an author.

SciScoop Top Authors