<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Argiope aurantia : Living, Lusting, Loving, Wed, Dead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-6-25-74043-0679.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-6-25-74043-0679.html</link>
	<description>Scooping up science news and dropping it on your desk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gypsysoul</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-6-25-74043-0679.html/comment-page-1#comment-5730</link>
		<dc:creator>gypsysoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2003 11:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=1484#comment-5730</guid>
		<description>So you&#039;re saying--gee... that RJ is right-- that the hetero male indeed lusts first, based on whatever particular physical aspect of the female happens to intrigue him.  And then, perchance, he may notice that this physical aspect comes attached to a brain or an especially neat personality, or if he gets really lucky, both.  What a relief, Alan, that you have conquered that unseemly and outmoded behavior, opting instead for the pleasure of cushion shopping :-).  Your significant other has found herself quite a catch! I&#039;m proud of you for overcoming those baser instincts in your efforts to appear worthy in the eyes of your breast-er- soul-mate. 
&lt;p&gt;
In my own totally unscientific poll (one male), it seems that love and lust CAN occur simultaneously, at least, in rare cases.  This poll has soothed my psyche.  
&lt;p&gt;
As usual, you have given us THE final answer on this most significant of all Sciscoop topics. 
Women everywhere thank you for your candid and astute explanation as to why males gaze in the area of our sternums rather than our eyes when they try to converse with us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;re saying&#8211;gee&#8230; that RJ is right&#8211; that the hetero male indeed lusts first, based on whatever particular physical aspect of the female happens to intrigue him.  And then, perchance, he may notice that this physical aspect comes attached to a brain or an especially neat personality, or if he gets really lucky, both.  What a relief, Alan, that you have conquered that unseemly and outmoded behavior, opting instead for the pleasure of cushion shopping :-).  Your significant other has found herself quite a catch! I&#8217;m proud of you for overcoming those baser instincts in your efforts to appear worthy in the eyes of your breast-er- soul-mate. </p>
<p>
In my own totally unscientific poll (one male), it seems that love and lust CAN occur simultaneously, at least, in rare cases.  This poll has soothed my psyche.
</p>
<p>
As usual, you have given us THE final answer on this most significant of all Sciscoop topics.<br />
Women everywhere thank you for your candid and astute explanation as to why males gaze in the area of our sternums rather than our eyes when they try to converse with us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickyjames</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-6-25-74043-0679.html/comment-page-1#comment-5674</link>
		<dc:creator>rickyjames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2003 11:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=1484#comment-5674</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
if all the atoms in the universe were transformed into breasts, there would still not be enough breasts...
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Must...look....elsewhere....for....tomorrow&#039;s....science.....quote.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
if all the atoms in the universe were transformed into breasts, there would still not be enough breasts&#8230;
</p></blockquote>
<p>Must&#8230;look&#8230;.elsewhere&#8230;.for&#8230;.tomorrow&#8217;s&#8230;.science&#8230;..quote&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Von Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-6-25-74043-0679.html/comment-page-1#comment-5610</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Von Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2003 10:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=1484#comment-5610</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Chambers Dictionary:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;i&gt;Lust n&lt;/i&gt; strong sexual desire; passionate desire; eagerness to possess; longing; appetite; relish (&lt;i&gt;rare&lt;/i&gt;); pleasure (&lt;i&gt;Spenser and Shakesp&lt;/i&gt;).-&lt;i&gt;vi&lt;/i&gt; to desire eagerly (with &lt;i&gt;after&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;for&lt;/i&gt;); to have strong sexual desire; to have strong desires. [OE &lt;i&gt;lust&lt;/i&gt; pleasure].&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Me:&lt;/strong&gt;To summarise, from a (heterosexual) male point of view, if all the atoms in the universe were transformed into breasts, there would still not be enough breasts. The degree of lust engendered is affected by the perceived quality of the breasts according to the personal tastes of the viewer. Love comes into play once it has been ascertained that the breasts in question are friendly breasts that it might be worth settling down with. With careful training from an early age however, this can happen &lt;i&gt;very quickly&lt;/i&gt; after the male in question has been made aware of the putative presence of the breasts (it is not actually necessary to observe the breasts, a reasonable certainty that they exist is enough to ensure follow-up action to be taken concerning their affability).&lt;p&gt; I am of course speaking of other males; I myself am a paragon of virtue who would far rather go shopping for cushions than indulge in such outmoded and unseemly behaviour.&lt;p&gt; Today&#039;s game is guess the BS level; answers on a postcard to Germaine Greer(on the grounds that you know &lt;i&gt;she&lt;/i&gt; knows the answer).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Chambers Dictionary:</strong><i>Lust n</i> strong sexual desire; passionate desire; eagerness to possess; longing; appetite; relish (<i>rare</i>); pleasure (<i>Spenser and Shakesp</i>).-<i>vi</i> to desire eagerly (with <i>after</i> or <i>for</i>); to have strong sexual desire; to have strong desires. [OE <i>lust</i> pleasure].
<p><strong>Me:</strong>To summarise, from a (heterosexual) male point of view, if all the atoms in the universe were transformed into breasts, there would still not be enough breasts. The degree of lust engendered is affected by the perceived quality of the breasts according to the personal tastes of the viewer. Love comes into play once it has been ascertained that the breasts in question are friendly breasts that it might be worth settling down with. With careful training from an early age however, this can happen <i>very quickly</i> after the male in question has been made aware of the putative presence of the breasts (it is not actually necessary to observe the breasts, a reasonable certainty that they exist is enough to ensure follow-up action to be taken concerning their affability).</p>
<p> I am of course speaking of other males; I myself am a paragon of virtue who would far rather go shopping for cushions than indulge in such outmoded and unseemly behaviour.</p>
<p> Today&#8217;s game is guess the BS level; answers on a postcard to Germaine Greer(on the grounds that you know <i>she</i> knows the answer).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gypsysoul</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-6-25-74043-0679.html/comment-page-1#comment-5538</link>
		<dc:creator>gypsysoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 10:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=1484#comment-5538</guid>
		<description>...or maybe it&#039;s only that danged male/female thing. I could have sworn that lust means a whole lot more than just attraction.   And that your &quot;loving&quot; verb was a delicate way of saying,
----ing the poor spider to death.
&lt;p&gt;
Gee, I wish I&#039;d known all these years that the gentlemen making contact with me were actually lusting in their hearts.  I  thought they merely needed help with their French homework or were being gallant, or Southernly hospitable, or  otherwise just friendly.  Thanks for the insight.
:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;or maybe it&#8217;s only that danged male/female thing. I could have sworn that lust means a whole lot more than just attraction.   And that your &#8220;loving&#8221; verb was a delicate way of saying,<br />
&#8212;-ing the poor spider to death.</p>
<p>
Gee, I wish I&#8217;d known all these years that the gentlemen making contact with me were actually lusting in their hearts.  I  thought they merely needed help with their French homework or were being gallant, or Southernly hospitable, or  otherwise just friendly.  Thanks for the insight.<br />
:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickyjames</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-6-25-74043-0679.html/comment-page-1#comment-5455</link>
		<dc:creator>rickyjames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=1484#comment-5455</guid>
		<description>Lust comes first, then love.  Lust is an attraction felt by an individual that draws that person into making contact with the object of their (hoped for) affection.  Love is when the attraction is felt mutually and is reciprocated, and this can only occur after the initial contact - which was motivated by lust.    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lust comes first, then love.  Lust is an attraction felt by an individual that draws that person into making contact with the object of their (hoped for) affection.  Love is when the attraction is felt mutually and is reciprocated, and this can only occur after the initial contact &#8211; which was motivated by lust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gypsysoul</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-6-25-74043-0679.html/comment-page-1#comment-5355</link>
		<dc:creator>gypsysoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=1484#comment-5355</guid>
		<description>Then you agree with me that the more typical order, at least among sober humans, is living, LOVING, lusting,... rather than our fearless administrator&#039;s version of living, lusting, loving.  Of course, RJ is using a euphemism for the physical activity, not the emotional entanglement we humans find ourselves in from time to time.  Perhaps the typical argiope male consumes large quantities of some alcoholic nectar before taking the suicide plunge... That would explain the indiscriminate lust.
&lt;p&gt;
Great idea on keeping the dictionary handy while on telephone hold, also.  At least we&#039;ll no longer need one handy for telemarketing pitches... if we can ever get through to the DON&#039;T CALL directory. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then you agree with me that the more typical order, at least among sober humans, is living, LOVING, lusting,&#8230; rather than our fearless administrator&#8217;s version of living, lusting, loving.  Of course, RJ is using a euphemism for the physical activity, not the emotional entanglement we humans find ourselves in from time to time.  Perhaps the typical argiope male consumes large quantities of some alcoholic nectar before taking the suicide plunge&#8230; That would explain the indiscriminate lust.</p>
<p>
Great idea on keeping the dictionary handy while on telephone hold, also.  At least we&#8217;ll no longer need one handy for telemarketing pitches&#8230; if we can ever get through to the DON&#8217;T CALL directory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Von Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-6-25-74043-0679.html/comment-page-1#comment-5239</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Von Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 03:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=1484#comment-5239</guid>
		<description>...that lust is usually quite discriminating (although alcohol can have an effect here).&lt;p&gt; With regard to ferreting out useful information in otherwise unoccupied time: I remember reading a short bio of a CEO who increased his vocabulary by keeping a dictionary on his desk, which he read whenever he telephoned someone and was put &#039;on hold&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;that lust is usually quite discriminating (although alcohol can have an effect here).
<p> With regard to ferreting out useful information in otherwise unoccupied time: I remember reading a short bio of a CEO who increased his vocabulary by keeping a dictionary on his desk, which he read whenever he telephoned someone and was put &#8216;on hold&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Von Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-6-25-74043-0679.html/comment-page-1#comment-5104</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Von Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 18:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=1484#comment-5104</guid>
		<description>It sounds as though this will make a useful plank for supporters of Richard Dawkins&#039; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Selfish_Gene&quot;&gt;&#039;selfish gene&#039;&lt;/a&gt; theories. (An article touching on this subject and others can be found &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marxist.com/science/selfishgene.html&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. It&#039;s quite long, and written to make a point, but makes intersting reading)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds as though this will make a useful plank for supporters of Richard Dawkins&#8217; <a href="http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Selfish_Gene">&#8217;selfish gene&#8217;</a> theories. (An article touching on this subject and others can be found <a href="http://www.marxist.com/science/selfishgene.html">here</a>. It&#8217;s quite long, and written to make a point, but makes intersting reading)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gypsysoul</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-6-25-74043-0679.html/comment-page-1#comment-4935</link>
		<dc:creator>gypsysoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=1484#comment-4935</guid>
		<description>Poor guys... reminds me of Sara Teasdale&#039;s poem &quot;Barter&quot;:  &quot;And for a breath of ecstasy/ Give all you&#039;ve been, or could be.&quot; I consider this barter to be a bit unbalanced, but only the male Argiope knows for sure, and dead spiders tell no tales. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor guys&#8230; reminds me of Sara Teasdale&#8217;s poem &#8220;Barter&#8221;:  &#8220;And for a breath of ecstasy/ Give all you&#8217;ve been, or could be.&#8221; I consider this barter to be a bit unbalanced, but only the male Argiope knows for sure, and dead spiders tell no tales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gypsysoul</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-6-25-74043-0679.html/comment-page-1#comment-4745</link>
		<dc:creator>gypsysoul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2003 11:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=1484#comment-4745</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for the info and the link.  Who needs the entire mayfly course when one has access to  National Geographic and a wait in a doctor&#039;s office?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for the info and the link.  Who needs the entire mayfly course when one has access to  National Geographic and a wait in a doctor&#8217;s office?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
