<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bacteria Discovered To Convert Sugar Directly Into Electricity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-9-8-64458-19223.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-9-8-64458-19223.html</link>
	<description>Scooping up science news and dropping it on your desk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:31:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: InelRum</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-9-8-64458-19223.html/comment-page-1#comment-3435</link>
		<dc:creator>InelRum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2003 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=1592#comment-3435</guid>
		<description>Sure, the current method is more economical, but what will we do in 2046, the estimated time when ALL the earth&#039;s petroleum will run out.  Why do you think so many companies are investing in an alternate source of energy, that&#039;s simply easy to understand, EVENTUALLY WE&#039;RE GOING TO RUN OUT OF THE ONLY SOURCE OF ENERGY WE ACTUALLY HAVE!!!
So lets start looking for another one now, while there&#039;s still time.  Think About It.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, the current method is more economical, but what will we do in 2046, the estimated time when ALL the earth&#8217;s petroleum will run out.  Why do you think so many companies are investing in an alternate source of energy, that&#8217;s simply easy to understand, EVENTUALLY WE&#8217;RE GOING TO RUN OUT OF THE ONLY SOURCE OF ENERGY WE ACTUALLY HAVE!!!<br />
So lets start looking for another one now, while there&#8217;s still time.  Think About It.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-9-8-64458-19223.html/comment-page-1#comment-2837</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2003 04:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=1592#comment-2837</guid>
		<description>The microbe uses the carbon, oxygen and hydrogen for its process.  These are also present in organic waste as sugar-like compounds.  The idea is to use fuels that are essentially free where cost is important.  Alternatively, special applications like cell phones or remote military stuff could use a special fuel where cost is secondary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The microbe uses the carbon, oxygen and hydrogen for its process.  These are also present in organic waste as sugar-like compounds.  The idea is to use fuels that are essentially free where cost is important.  Alternatively, special applications like cell phones or remote military stuff could use a special fuel where cost is secondary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-9-8-64458-19223.html/comment-page-1#comment-2014</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=1592#comment-2014</guid>
		<description>As far as i can tell world sugar prices for raw sugar (bulk) was at about 5-7 cents per lb. in 2002, according to the usda... that is for raw sugar (not refined) and i am sure that other sugar sources aside from Sucrose will prove to be cheaper. Your comment sure got me thinking though
I apologise for the Horrid grammar and spelling. English is not my favorite language.
J-n </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as i can tell world sugar prices for raw sugar (bulk) was at about 5-7 cents per lb. in 2002, according to the usda&#8230; that is for raw sugar (not refined) and i am sure that other sugar sources aside from Sucrose will prove to be cheaper. Your comment sure got me thinking though<br />
I apologise for the Horrid grammar and spelling. English is not my favorite language.<br />
J-n</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2003-9-8-64458-19223.html/comment-page-1#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2003 16:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=1592#comment-885</guid>
		<description>A little back-of-the-envelope economics.&lt;br&gt;
sugar to produce 1Kwh: 1 cup = .47lb&lt;br&gt;
price of sugar (US, retail) = $.43 &lt;br&gt;
&#160; &#160;(EU about 1.5X this)&lt;br&gt;
sugar cost of 1Kwh bio-electricity = $.20&lt;br&gt;
&#039;current&#039; price of 1Kwh (US, retail, nominal)&lt;br&gt;
&#160; &#160; = $.084&lt;p&gt;
So this is 2.4X as expensive as commercially produced power.&lt;p&gt;
NB: In Cuba, the low cost of sugar would make this form of energy competative.&lt;p&gt;
Wavyhill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little back-of-the-envelope economics.<br />
sugar to produce 1Kwh: 1 cup = .47lb<br />
price of sugar (US, retail) = $.43 <br />
&nbsp; &nbsp;(EU about 1.5X this)<br />
sugar cost of 1Kwh bio-electricity = $.20<br />
&#8216;current&#8217; price of 1Kwh (US, retail, nominal)<br />
&nbsp; &nbsp; = $.084
<p>
So this is 2.4X as expensive as commercially produced power.</p>
<p>
NB: In Cuba, the low cost of sugar would make this form of energy competative.</p>
<p>
Wavyhill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
