Archaeology Friday, October 8, 2004 . This is a SciScoop post by Ricky James
My continuing cutsie title alliteration alludes to a somber discovery, a young woman who suffered maternal death thousands of years ago and deserves a moment of quiet comtemplation and respect today. From a press release by the University of Barcellona: In ancient times, female death rates were particularly high and generally related to problems in maternity, such as complications during pregnancy, childbirth or the period of breast-feeding. However, in most cases this link has only been established from indirect data, such paleodemographic data and ethnographic references, or based on the poor health conditions normally attributed to ancient human groups.
Joint research between the UAB and the Universidad de Murcia has found a clear example of an ancient burial of a pregnant woman whose death can be linked to difficult birth (dystocia). The archaeological team from the Universidad de Murcia, headed by Maria Manuela Ayala, found the remains in 1996 at the “El cerro de las Viñas” site in Murcia (Spain). Now, the UAB anthropologists, headed by Assumpció Malgosa, have established that it is the oldest case so far described in the paleopathological literature. The research was recently published in the International Journal of Osteoarchaeology.
The burial dates from the Argaric period, between 1,500 and 1,000 years BC, in the Bronze Age. Argaric culture funeral rituals were characterised by individual inhumations, most of them within the dwelling or its perimeter. This burial is within one of these dwellings. It is that of a young woman, about 25-26 years of age, with a foetus in the 37th to 39th week of gestation in the uterine cavity, in a crosswise position and with part of the right arm outside the uterus.
In line with modern obstetric practices, the study of the two individuals and differential diagnosis has enabled the probable cause of death of the mother, and therefore the foetus, to be established as dystocia due to position of the foetus. Without a caesarean section, the mother probably died of sepsis, haemorrhage and exhaustion during the birth, and the foetus of heart failure.
Previously: « Kurzweil: Quest For Eternal Youth
SciScoop Science News is a forum for news, views and controversial conjectures. Please contact us if would like to submit a guest post.
5 Responses to Death Cause Identified As Spanish Guy
barakn
October 9th, 2004 at 10:05 am
one of those time-traveling Spaniards.
Sweetwind
October 9th, 2004 at 11:40 am
…for the sake of continuing the cutsie title alliteration spree (well, rhyming spree in this case). :-)
That is, assuming it’s the dad that’s being blamed here. The fetus is the more proximate cause of death. If the fetus is a male, then can’t we justifiably call it a Spaniard, if the Kennewick Man is called the Kennewick Man?
rickyjames
October 9th, 2004 at 3:39 pm
I like to think I’m hip and imaginative and all that, but I don’t see an implied time-travel wisecrack here at all. I just meant that the unforunate mom had obviously been made pregnant by a dad, and that in one sense this was ultimately the cause of her death. Am I missing something my subconscious is laughing about, like the dreaded / D.R.E.aded Finger from a while back?
I swear, sometimes it seems awfully crowded in my skull with all those voices in there.
barakn
October 9th, 2004 at 4:49 pm
would call the man an Argar, but that’s just a place name for a site in Spain, and the culture itself left no linguistic clues as to what to call it. Spanish man is an exceptable alternative, if Kennewick man works.
gypsysoul
October 10th, 2004 at 7:31 am
feel much better. I caught neither the Spaniard comment nor the DREaded finger quip, but I figured that was one of those inside male jokes <certainly, no pun intended>.
My real cause for alarm is that I’ve never been able to sit through a Matrix flick. Okay, so I’m not a ferret. I did manage A Clockwork Orange, but I was younger and more patient in the olden days.