CognitiveScience Monday, November 29, 2004 . This is a SciScoop post by Ricky James
In the current study, the researchers used a brain imaging technique known as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure the brain activity of 14 individuals with high functioning autism while they performed a simple memory task involving letters of the alphabet. Specifically, the study volunteers were shown a sequence of letters. After each letter, they were asked to name the letter that preceded it. In some cases, they were asked to name the letter that appeared two letters previously. The autism volunteers’ brain activation patterns were compared to a control group of people who did not have autism, but were of a similar age and I.Q. level.
Both groups successfully completed the task. However, the fMRI scans revealed different brain activation patterns between the two groups. Compared to the control group, the volunteers with autism showed more activation in the right hemisphere, or half, of the brain, and less activation in the left hemisphere. The left hemisphere takes the lead in processing letters, words and sentences, whereas the right hemisphere plays a larger role in processing shapes and visual information.
Dr. Just said that the brain could interpret letters either spatially, as geometric shapes, or linguistically, by the names of the letters. The imaging data indicated that the volunteers with autism remembered letters as shapes, while the control group remembered them by their names.
The brain activation patterns of the two groups also differed in other ways. While performing the task, the group with autism showed less activation in the anterior, or front, parts of the brain, and more activation in the posterior, or rear parts of the brain. Dr. Just explained that the brain’s anterior portions carry out higher-level thinking and reasoning while the posterior portion is more involved with perceiving details.
Compared to the control group, the different brain areas of the people with autism were less likely to work in synchrony (at the same time) while recalling the letters. Such synchronization between brain areas takes place during many kinds of higher-level thinking and analysis that prove difficult for many people with autism.
These current findings provide evidence in support of the theory developed by these researchers. Called the theory of underconnectivity in autism, it maintains that autism results from a failure of the brain’s neurological wiring–the fibers of nervous system tissue that interconnect the individual parts of the brain. Deprived of effective connections, the different brain areas must work independently, sometimes performing at a higher level individually than they do in people who do not have autism. This may allow some people with autism to excel at spelling and other detail-oriented tasks but make it difficult for them to comprehend more complex material.
The researchers published their theory in the July issue of Brain, in conjunction with the results of another fMRI study of volunteers with autism. In that study, volunteers were asked a question about a simple sentence that they had just read. When the people with autism performed the task, their brains showed less synchronization than did the brains of the control group. Moreover, the brains of the group with autism had less activation in an anterior part of the brain that integrates the words of a sentence, and more activation in a posterior brain area that comprehends individual words.
Many behavioral therapies to treat autism stress rote learning, Dr. Minshew explained. Such strategies are helpful, particularly early in a child’s development. However, if the theory of underconnectivity proves valid, therapies that stimulate brain areas to work in synchrony might also offer some benefit. Such therapies might stress problem solving skills and creative thinking, and attempt to foster flexibility in thinking.
Dr. Just noted that more evidence to support the theory might come from the group’s on-going studies of other cognitive abilities. The researchers are attempting to determine if underconnectivity is a general feature of the brain in autism, and are using brain imaging studies to examine the brain’s white matter in people with autism. White matter is the part of the brain that consists of the larger neurological connections spanning different parts of the brain.
SciScoop Science News is a forum for news, views and controversial conjectures. Please contact us if would like to submit a guest post.
2 Responses to Autism As Synesthesia?
Sweetwind
November 29th, 2004 at 6:03 pm
Isn’t synesthesia about information processing from one point of the brain “leaking” into another part of the brain? (E.g. word processing information leaking into the color processing area and producing perceptions of colors that don’t exist.) This study, on the other hand, is viewed as confirming the theory that autism is due to excessively standalone (leak-proof) brain areas. This article makes it sound like, rather than getting double perceptions of letters (as shapes and as linguistic entities) autistics are getting only shapes.
dobbo12
December 31st, 2004 at 4:58 am
Rather than leakage of information processing, this research is concerned with the extent of connectivity between different regions of the brain. As well as the connectivity within the regions. It is our White Brain Matter that enables this connectivity, where it carries out a role similiar to cables. Though, the crucial factor, is that we are born with virtually no White Matter, just Grey Matter. Further to this, white matter ‘cabling’ grows in response to attempts to connect information within in our grey matter. Whilst individual Grey Cells develop their own network of White Cell cables. The growth of multi-cable ‘white cell highways’ occurs,along well used routes. In turn, major Freeways are also developed between all the Regions of the brain. Through the use of MRI scans, it has been shown that in the case of Autism, that the failure to develop a comprehensive white matter Freeway to the Anterior Region of the brain, may be the causative factor. Given that this region plays the role of bringing information together from other regions, and then crucially ‘contextualising’ it. Which is said to explain why people with Autism may have an extensive vocabulary, yet not be able to fully comprehend a sentence. Though the fact our White Matter grows in response to attempts to connect our Grey Matter. Offers some hope for addressing Autism. Where it was noted in the first posting, that a focus on Rote Learning is probably misdirected? Given that it is involvement with more divergent thinking, that stimulates the growth of new white matter cables.
Yet your mention of Synethesia, I would suggest, reflects the brains capacity to make use of alternative regions than normally used for specific mental activities. Which has already been recognised,where it has been shown that the brain will co-opt a different region, when the usual one is not accessible. Where the process involves the building of a white matter highway to the region.
So that ‘Sound’ can also be processed within the ‘Visual’ region?
Perhaps in relation to white matter highways, I would mention recent research that has identified that the growth of a white matter connection to the frontal region of the brain. The region which enables information to be comprehended in a broader context. Only begins to grow in the later teenage years of life.
Which has been used to explain what has been described as the ‘reckless behaviour’ we all go through as teenagers. Where we are not yet able to fully comprehend all of the information that we have taken in? Given the lack of access to our pre-frontal brain!
Further to this, the brain also uses what is termed as ‘pruning’ to remove disused white matter. Under the, ‘use it or lose it’ principle.
Where significant loss of white matter has been identified in Alzheimers.