SciScoop Science News header image

The Lost H-Bomb Of Tybee Island

Warfare Monday, May 3, 2004 . This is a SciScoop post by Ricky James

  • Share/Bookmark

It might well have remained a footnote to Cold War history were it not for the man on the boat and his one question: Is it a danger?

As a child growing up near Savannah, Derek Duke, 58, heard the story: A pilot was forced to jettison a hydrogen bomb near Tybee, one of city’s barrier islands, after a midair collision.

But it wasn’t until 1998, when he stumbled onto some old news stories about the “Tybee Bomb” while surfing the Web, that Duke became intrigued by it.

He searched the Internet and local newspaper archives. He read the limited information available about the bomb. Many details, including the amount of uranium it contained, remain classified.

By 1999, he began contacting others who might know something about the case. He talked to people who lived in the area. He wrote letters requesting unclassified documents.

Duke then looked up the pilot.

Howard Richardson was surprised by the telephone call from Duke. Richardson shared his story.

It was Feb. 5, 1958, and he was a major at the controls of a B-47 bomber, one of a dozen from the 19th Bombardment Wing taking off on a training mission from Homestead Air Force Base in Florida.

At the time, crews in training routinely carried transportation-configured nuclear bombs, with the detonation capsules removed to prevent a nuclear explosion, the Air Force said. It gave the crews the opportunity to practice, said Billy Mullins, associate director of the Air Force Nuclear Weapons and Counterproliferation Agency.

The mission was to simulate dropping a bomb on a city in the Soviet Union and to evade Air Force fighters sent up to simulate Russian interceptors.

Over Reston, Va., which unknowingly was playing the role of the Soviet city, Richardson’s navigator lined up the target on the radar screen and punched the launch button. The button activated a transmitter that recorded how close the crew came to hitting the target.

Richardson then turned south toward home through a screen of “enemy” fighters. When he and his two-man crew crossed into North Carolina at more than 37,000 feet, they were back in friendly skies.

But that’s when the B-47 collided in midair with one of the “enemy” fighters.

Struggling to keep the bomber under control, Richardson headed for Hunter Army Airfield in Savannah. But the tower operator told the crew the runway was under construction.

“I thought that if we landed short, the plane would catch the front of the runway and the bomb would shoot through the plane like a bullet through a gun barrel,” Richardson said.

So, on that clear, moonlit night, Richardson turned the B-47 toward sea and dropped the bomb in the ocean before landing.

‘Something is just not right’

Navy divers searched the waters near Tybee Island for nearly 10 weeks. The weather was bad, the water cold, the visibility poor. On April 16, 1958, the military declared the bomb “irretrievably lost.” No. 47782 became one of 11 “Broken Arrows,” nuclear bombs lost during air or sea mishaps, according to U.S. military records.

Four months after Richardson’s accident, the Atomic Energy Commission changed its policy, banning the use of nuclear bombs during training.

As Duke was learning this, he turned up a copy of the receipt Richardson had signed. Written near the top was the word “simulated.” That, according to the Air Force, meant the bomb did not have a detonation capsule. Without it, there was no risk of a nuclear explosion.

That might have been the end of the story if not for another document Duke soon acquired.

This one was a letter, written in 1966 to the chairman of the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy, recounting the testimony of Assistant Defense Secretary Jack Howard before a 1966 congressional committee.

Howard, the letter says, testified that there were four complete nuclear weapons, including detonation capsules, that were missing or lost. Among them: the bomb dropped off Savannah.

Decades later, Howard recanted his testimony after Duke gave the letter to the media and elected officials.

That’s when Duke’s intrigue turned to determination.

“Until that point, I bought the military’s story,” he said. “But not now. Something is just not right.”

Tainted motives?

He began studying topography maps, tidal charts and weather patterns. But Duke knew he needed help navigating the waterways. In Harris Parker, 64, a treasure hunter and movie consultant, he found an expert and a partner.

Together, Duke and Parker spent hours trolling Wassaw Sound, dragging Geiger counters behind their boat and bringing up sand to test. Mapping every inch of their effort, they identified what they believe is a plume of radiation, although the readings are only slightly higher than the sea’s natural radiation level.

But the plume wasn’t near Tybee Island. Rather, it was just off Wassaw Island, about 20 miles from Savannah. Perhaps, Duke says, the bomber crew had mistaken one landmark — an old World War II bunker — for another near Savannah when it dropped the bomb.

In August 2000, Duke gave the Howard letter to U.S. Rep. Jack Kingston, a Savannah Republican. Kingston, in turn, asked the Air Force to investigate whether a live nuclear bomb might be lurking off the Georgia coast.

On April 12, 2001, the Air Force Nuclear Weapons and Counterproliferation Agency reported the bomb was likely buried 5 to 15 feet below the ocean floor. There is “no current or future possibility of a nuclear explosion,” the report said. And if left undisturbed, the conventional explosives in the bomb posed no hazard.

Nonetheless, after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, some folks in Savannah began to worry. A town-hall meeting was called to discuss the bomb and the Air Force findings.

“If we’re so worried about terrorists getting ahold of nuclear weapons, why aren’t we doing anything about this?” Duke says. “Right down there, somewhere, is the material to make a dirty bomb.”

So Duke, Parker and a handful of others formed a company to look for the bomb and submitted a bid to the government to locate it. The bid — $900,000-plus — was denied.

Parker, meanwhile, co-wrote a movie script, titled “The Tybee Bomb,” a Tom Clancy-esque mystery. But the script, along with the creation of the company, led some to wonder about their motives.

At home in Jackson, Miss., Richardson eases onto a couch.

Richardson, 82, is a big man with a gentle heart. He doesn’t like to speak ill of anyone, but …

“Derek Duke just doesn’t know what he’s talking about. I keep telling him he’s wrong,” he said. “The paper says no capsule on board. I think I know what I signed for.”

He has come to believe Duke and Parker are motivated more by money than by virtue. He points to the government bid and the movie script. “They are scaring those people in Savannah for no good reason,” he said.

Back on the Boston Whaler, Parker and Duke check the onboard Global Positioning System gear as they motor toward where they believe the bomb rests.

Their efforts are at a standstill. They don’t have the hundreds of thousands of dollars needed to take the search underwater. They don’t have the backing of the military, the government or local elected officials.

Parker stops the boat a few hundred yards from the soft, fine sand of Wassaw Island and turns off the engine.

It’s quiet, except for the occasional bird or a dolphin breaking the surface.

“It’s down there,” Duke says. “Somewhere.”

9 Responses to The Lost H-Bomb Of Tybee Island

apsmith

May 3rd, 2004 at 11:14 am

well, I suppose the uranium could explode… but the tritium in the thermonuclear warhead would be long-spent, converted He-3.

Avatar

rickyjames

May 3rd, 2004 at 12:12 pm

…the dolphins would not be happy.  

I wonder if this event (in 1958) is where Ian Fleming got the idea for stealing underwater nukes in Thunderball?

Avatar

pinerob

May 3rd, 2004 at 12:46 pm

While I don’t believe the weapon is a danger to anything in its current state, I do believe that it should be recovered if for no other reason than ensuring that al-qaeda-type people don’t try to steal it and use it as a weapon;and also secure it from others who would be foolhardy enough to experiment with it.

I would however like for the federal government to recover it and not Derek Duke and Co. He has shown a proclivity for making money off of this issue and his true motives are questionable.

Avatar

jxliv7

May 3rd, 2004 at 7:07 pm

.
…any government to wait until the participants in an embarassing event or operation are dead or senile to finally do something. Look at how many years it’s taken for some people to be brought to justice for their acts in WWII.

But, there is one overwhelming mitigating factor here: there’s a substantial amount of nuclear material lying around, waiting to be retrieved. I would prefer that it not end up in the hands of the wrong group (i.e., Al-Qaeda). The chances of the bad guys detonating it in a metropolitan city–like where I live now–is pretty likely.

Having lived in that area of the southeast for years, however, I really wouldn’t miss those couple hundred miles of contaminated coastline, marsh, and barrier islands if it did blow up near Savannah. Sorry…

Avatar

SEWilco

May 4th, 2004 at 11:34 am

When talking about a dirty bomb, keep in mind that such a weapon is not exactly earth-shattering. Victims aren’t going to die by the hundreds within days. In the inner ring, which depending upon the material might cover yards, two city blocks, or a neighborhood, residents living there for forty years would have a one percent increased chance of dying of cancer. Perhaps living there for less than 40 years would help. That FAS study has one scenario that would require “medical monitoring” for people within about two blocks of the bomb, other than those killed by the dynamite. A nearby larger area is comparable to annual limits for radiation workers.

Compare those numbers to 40,000 killed each year by automobile accidents, and wonder how many of the future cancer victims will die before they get cancer.

Avatar

Anonymous

May 4th, 2004 at 11:53 am

Everything about this story and especially the structure and content of the tybee bomb website just screams BOGUS.

Avatar

jxliv7

May 4th, 2004 at 5:05 pm

.
…about an “Anonymous Hero” who wonders about bogus stories pegs my insincerity meter into the red.

Step up to the non-bogus world of SciScoop regististration, AH, and give us some reasons.

Minor rant: if you’re not willing to identify yourself when you post, I think your post should be given the attention that any rumor deserves — ignore, trash, and forget it.

Avatar

Anonymous

May 4th, 2004 at 5:09 pm

This is the horse’s mouth. With just the facts…

A “no danger hydrogen bomb” lost in 12 feet of water buried under a little sand within 1 mile of the beach. Now that’s a statement.

Rather than questioning those concerned with trying to get this thing outta there, maybe you really should ask your federal government why it has steadfastly refused to devote even 1 week of serious location attention to the no kidding nuke. What is this with their new technology for such things? Afraid to use that exotic gear for fear of disclosing secrets with what they might find?

Have they showed you the nuclear capsule assigned to this lost bomb? Or have they offered up the paper trail for such a capsule or group of capsules. I am talking the physical Pu. All this type H bomb were dismantled in the 1960’s.
But the Pu capsules were stored (I mean, after all, they have a radioactive half life of 20,000 years or more). So where is this 1? In the bomb?
No way you say…OK…i will believe, if you, our government who never lies, shows us this old capsule being stored for a bomb that no longer exists…except at Tybee.

If a capsule is in the Tybee Bomb, it is in the pre-arm position. Even after all these years, the high explosives will work.
That long lived Pu will work. To the guy talking about tritium and its decay, smart guy BUT this was a pre-trit bomb. check the mark 15 mod 0 specs…NO trit if you care to read the facts.

http://www.tybeebomb.com presents a lot of stuff. Bogus you say…maybe… but the real info is there…nuke weapon design and weapon specs and diagrams. go learn something. you’re smart. study it hard and figure it out. a mystery you can solve.

and learn this. when that baby landed after being dropped from the bomber at 250 mph and 7000 plus feet of altitude, it landed hard enough to bury in the seabed but not hard enough to detonate the TNT. That itself tells you something. In now 46 years of exposure, while you can assume there would be environmental corrosion of this incredibly strong “bunker buster bomb”, rather than making it more safe, that same logic could take you to the defeat of the physical barriers of the nuke capsule from the detonation chamber. In other words, the restraints have dissolved. Go figure. Could a hurricane strike Savannah and liquify the seabed.
Could storm surge toss the bomb onto the beach. Hurricanes have tossed buried heavy objects out of the water onto the beach before. That toss and landing G could slam the capsule from the pre-arm position thru the corroded restaints into the firing position. That same stop could detonate the RX4 shaped charges. Nuke explosion? The bet is simple. The AF is betting your life on NOT.

But, those that created it including Paul Tibbets the first man to drop it, have always said that if the capsule is in the bomb, then stuff can happen.

Sleep tight tonight on the East Coast, your Air Force is at the poker table.

Avatar

GRLCowan

May 4th, 2004 at 10:34 pm

Without digging up the ten square metres of the seabed the bomb is hiding to a depth of 10 metres or so. And presumably digging to the same depth several million other square metres through not looking in the right place right away. Or maybe some sonar technique can see it without digging.

What’s certain is that it can never be found by its radiation, as the person promoting a new search seems to think. Even if its fission fuel were plutonium, this would be mighty hard. Being it’s enriched uranium, just 7 times more active than natural U, detection ain’t gonna happen.

— Graham Cowan
Boron — fireproof fuel, real-car range, no emissions

Avatar

Comment Form

About

SciScoop Science News is a forum for news, views and controversial conjectures. please contact us to submit a guest blog post idea to become an author.

SciScoop Top Authors