SciScoop Science News header image

The Reality Of Dreamblindness

CognitiveScience Monday, September 13, 2004 . This is a SciScoop post by Ricky James

  • Share/Bookmark

The syndrome is quite rare, especially cases that lack symptoms other than dream loss. Bassetti, then at the University of Bern, and his colleague Matthias Bischof, M.D, realized that this woman’s misfortune might provide valuable answers to the localization of dreaming in the brain.

For six weeks following the stroke, the researchers studied the patient’s brain waves as she slept. They found no disruptions in her sleep cycle. The fact that REM sleep continued normally was significant, because dreaming and REM sleep occur together, though research has pointed to different brain systems underlying the two. These results appear to confirm that dreaming and REM sleep are driven by independent brain systems.

Before the stroke, the patient recalled, she had experienced dreams three to four times a week. She now reported no dreams, even when awakened during REM sleep.

With time, some dreaming function did return. A year after the stroke, she experienced occasional dreams, but no more than one per week. The dreams were of a reduced vividness and intensity compared to before the stroke.

With MRI scans, Bischof and Bassetti determined that the stroke had damaged areas located deep in the back half of the brain. Recent research has shown that some of this region is involved in the visual processing of faces and landmarks, as well as the processing of emotions and visual memories, a logical set of functions for a brain area that would generate or control dreams.

“Further conclusions about this brain area and its role in dreams will require more studies analyzing dream changes in patients with brain damage,” said Bassetti.

1 Response to The Reality Of Dreamblindness

Anonymous

September 15th, 2004 at 8:28 am

But we’ve always heard about ho necessary dreams are, to the tune that they are some sort of background processing or cleanup. So the essential question becomes, "Has this patient’s waking mental function suffered at all du to the lack of dreams?"

I realize that there will be difficulty separating the effects of no dreams from the effects of the stroke. But wouldn’t the former get worse with time, while the latter are either stable, or recovering?

If there are not problems caused by not dreaming, either dreams aren’t really necessary after all, dreams are only a side-effect of the essential background/cleanup instead of the process itself, or the patient really is dreaming, it’s just that the path of getting those dreams into memory is blocked.

Avatar

Comment Form

About

SciScoop Science News is a forum for news, views and controversial conjectures. Please contact us if would like to submit a guest post.

SciScoop Top Authors