Biology Monday, November 14, 2005 . This is a SciScoop post by apsmith
Hare’s research was published in the October 2005 issue of Animal Behaviour: Functional morphology of Richardson’s ground squirrel, Spermophilus richardsonii, alarm calls: the meaning of chirps, whistles and chucks – subscription required to read the full article.
They key point from the abstract seems to be “Multiple acoustic parameters of Richardson’s ground squirrel alarm vocalizations thus interact to communicate information regarding several aspects of a predator encounter.”
So they’re definitely conveying more than a single bit of information… what makes something a real language, anyway?
SciScoop Science News is a forum for news, views and controversial conjectures. Please contact us if would like to submit a guest post.
2 Responses to The Language of Squirrels
November 14th, 2005 at 4:59 pm
There was similar research into singing mice reported widely in the UK, either last week or the week before too. Mammalian music is obviously, a hot topic.
telescopeguy
November 19th, 2005 at 2:06 am
Eugene Morton of the National Zoo years ago came up with his "motivation structure" theory to explain why, when factors of pitch and timing are renormalized so that acoustically analyzed (fast fourier) animal vocal signals all are fitted into the same window visually, so many different vertebrates (birds, mammals, etc.) seemed to have largely the "same" signal repertoire. That is, when a shrew chirps, a dog barks, and an elephant roars its the same signal, despite superficial differences having to do with scaling.
Besides pitch (rising, falling, arched, flat), these signals utilize smoothness or roughness, and other features that human language also does.
The most interesting aspect of the theory, taken together with findings from nonvocal signal work, is that visual and other modalities seem to utilize similarly interpreted features- which is maybe why we can also have sign language (which is highly iconic).
There is also evidence that the brain itself utilizes these feature parameters in its own functioning, suggesting that the external signals merely use convenient modalities to communicate brain to brain, as best as each modality will allow. Even invertebrates may share in this. Quite fascinating. But it isn’t music.
telescopeguy