<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Many Forms Of A Hybrid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciscoop.com/2005-4-22-112830-366.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2005-4-22-112830-366.html</link>
	<description>Scooping up science news and dropping it on your desk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: apsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2005-4-22-112830-366.html/comment-page-1#comment-3732</link>
		<dc:creator>apsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=956#comment-3732</guid>
		<description>Coal is pretty much by all measures the worst of our current major energy sources, so increasing it&#039;s use isn&#039;t good. Plug-in hybrids do provide a proof in principle that replacing oil itself isn&#039;t the issue; anything that makes electricity can in principle substitute for oil. It&#039;s an argument against those who strongly advocate for hydrogen or bio-fuels (or the &quot;we&#039;re all doomed&quot; crowd) because we&#039;re running out of oil; electricity itself can probably work as a transportation fuel just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coal is pretty much by all measures the worst of our current major energy sources, so increasing it&#8217;s use isn&#8217;t good. Plug-in hybrids do provide a proof in principle that replacing oil itself isn&#8217;t the issue; anything that makes electricity can in principle substitute for oil. It&#8217;s an argument against those who strongly advocate for hydrogen or bio-fuels (or the &#8220;we&#8217;re all doomed&#8221; crowd) because we&#8217;re running out of oil; electricity itself can probably work as a transportation fuel just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grqb</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2005-4-22-112830-366.html/comment-page-1#comment-3214</link>
		<dc:creator>grqb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 06:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=956#comment-3214</guid>
		<description>The NY Times article was saying that those who modified their Prius cars into plug-in cars got between 60-100 mpg fuel efficiency. The Prius now gets I think about 60 mpg max, so plug-ins obviously have potential. One thing the article was also saying though is that over 60% of the electricity generated is from coal power, and coal power pollutes more (for the same amount of energy output) than combusting gasoline does, so, plug-ins may actually increase emissions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NY Times article was saying that those who modified their Prius cars into plug-in cars got between 60-100 mpg fuel efficiency. The Prius now gets I think about 60 mpg max, so plug-ins obviously have potential. One thing the article was also saying though is that over 60% of the electricity generated is from coal power, and coal power pollutes more (for the same amount of energy output) than combusting gasoline does, so, plug-ins may actually increase emissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2005-4-22-112830-366.html/comment-page-1#comment-2512</link>
		<dc:creator>apsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2005 08:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=956#comment-2512</guid>
		<description>(Note, having recently purchased a Prius, which I&#039;m very happy with, I may be a little biased :))
&lt;p&gt;
One thing that&#039;s intrigued me is that back when steam ships were first being developed, the steam wasn&#039;t terribly reliable - I guess boilers often had problems, wouldn&#039;t last an entire journey, etc. Or wind was free, diesel fuel expensive, so why not save money by using sails too? So many early steamships were actually &quot;hybrids&quot; - they had sails too! See for example &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/lostliners/ocean.html&quot;&gt;this history&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;p&gt;
This history suggests that the complication of current hybrids will soon be replaced by the simplicity of the battery/electric system; the only thing holding that back is perhaps a factor of 3 or so in battery mass/energy storage performance; a bit of R&amp;D may be all we need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Note, having recently purchased a Prius, which I&#8217;m very happy with, I may be a little biased :))</p>
<p>
One thing that&#8217;s intrigued me is that back when steam ships were first being developed, the steam wasn&#8217;t terribly reliable &#8211; I guess boilers often had problems, wouldn&#8217;t last an entire journey, etc. Or wind was free, diesel fuel expensive, so why not save money by using sails too? So many early steamships were actually &#8220;hybrids&#8221; &#8211; they had sails too! See for example <a href="http://www.pbs.org/lostliners/ocean.html">this history</a>.
</p>
<p>
This history suggests that the complication of current hybrids will soon be replaced by the simplicity of the battery/electric system; the only thing holding that back is perhaps a factor of 3 or so in battery mass/energy storage performance; a bit of R&amp;D may be all we need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
