SciScoop Science News header image

The Earth’s energy imbalance is an expected consequence of increasing atmospheric pollution, especially carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone (O3), and black carbon particles (soot). These pollutants block the Earth’s radiant heat from escaping into space, increasing absorption of sunlight and trapping heat within the atmosphere.

“This energy imbalance is the ’smoking gun’ that we have been looking for,” says James Hansen, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, part of The Earth Institute at Columbia University, and the lead author of the study. “It shows that our estimates of the human-made and natural climate forcing agents are about right, and they are driving the Earth toward a warmer climate.”

Scientists know that increased radiation takes longer to manifest in the world’s oceans longer than it does on land; the ocean, instead of showing an immediate temperature increase, holds the heat in storage within its depths, thus delaying a response to human-induced, or anthropogenic, climate change. The ocean’s delayed response is similar to what happens during the summer months, when the ocean takes longer to warm up than do land surfaces. The building heat within the ocean’s depths is what is known as “thermal inertia.”

The lag in the ocean’s response has practical consequences. For one thing, it means that there is an additional global warming of about 1 degree Fahrenheit that is already “in the pipeline,” and has not yet manifested in overall ambient temperatures. Even if there were no further increase of human-induced gases in the air, climate would continue to warm about that much over the next century.

The lag in the climate response is both a boon and a problem for policy-makers. The delayed response of thermal inertia provides an opportunity to reduce the magnitude of human-made climate change before it is fully realized, provided that actions to reduce climate forcing agents are undertaken. On the other hand, if the world decides to wait for more overwhelming evidence of climate change, thermal inertia implies that still greater climate change will be in store, which may be difficult or impossible to avoid.

Warmer water temperatures around the world may also lead to other significant climate-related consequences. “Warmer waters increase the likelihood of accelerated ice sheet disintegration and sea level rise during this century,” Hansen said. Since 1993, data from satellite altimeters, used to measure sea level, have shown that the world’s oceans have risen by 3.2 centimeters (cm), or 1.26 inches, per decade (plus or minus 0.4 cm).

Although 3.2 cm may appear to be only a slight increase, it is twice as large as sea level rise in the last century. “There are positive feedbacks that come into play as the area of ice melt increases,” says Hansen, “so we need to monitor the ice sheets and sea level precisely to be sure that the system is not running out of our control.”

From a Press Release from The Earth Institute at Columbia University

Bookmark and Share

3 Responses to Scientists Confirm Earth’s Energy is Out of Balance

apsmith

April 29th, 2005 at 8:18 am

Does anybody have the number for the energy flow from the ground, from the heat from radioactive decay in Earth’s interior? I’m just wondering if it’s on the same scale as this 0.85 W/sq meter number. Total energy flow from the sun is about 200 W/sq meter averaged over Earth’s surface, so this is a pretty big number already, just curious what the other numbers are…

Avatar

SEWilco

May 3rd, 2005 at 10:53 pm

From a quick look, it’s about 50 mW/m2 heating averaged across the ocean floor. Shuffling the decimal point around makes that 0.050 W/m2, for comparison with the 0.85 W/m2 above.

Total power is 32 TW (W x 1012). Somewhat concentrated at thermal vents, and a lot is released through spreading ridge areas.

Avatar

Anonymous

May 4th, 2005 at 5:48 pm

These “scientists” need to get a real job. After a lifetime as a surveyor (read: “measurer”) and mine planner (read: “trying to balance inputs and outputs of actual measureable physical mass quantities”), I doubt they can “prove” that they actually woke up and ate breakfast this morning.

We do not understand energy well enough to prove anything. So try not to induce global mass hysteria if at all possible.

Thanks,

Chucky

Avatar

Comment Form