SciScoop Science News header image

Less Neutrons–Better Model?

Chemistry Thursday, August 18, 2005 . This is a SciScoop post by deanlsinclair

  • Share/Bookmark

If one discards the idea of neutrons having discrete identities in the nuclei of atoms, a potentially very useful model appears. Nuclei can be considered as having structure composed solely of electrons and protons, somewhat analogous to the molecular structures of molecules, which are considered to be made up of atoms bonded by electrons.

Looked at in this way, one may postulate that, if a mollecule and an atom consist of the same “building blocks,” under some conditions, one can be changed to the other.

Hydrogen molecule and Deuterium atom both consist of two electrons and two protons, in this model. In the continuing “3D-dance” of the Hydrogen molecule, it is easily possible that, at some instant, it has a geometry identical to–but an energy greaatly different from–its “atom isomer,” the Deuterium atom.

The loss of a large quantum of energy could stabilize the mono-nuclear form.  If one assumes that the “catalytic-surface” matrix of some electrolytic cells can accept this quantum and degrade it to heat, we have an explanation for the “Mysterious Cold-Fusion Phenomenon.”

 Depending on the type of “Hydrogen molecule” involved, expected “atomic isomer” results could include Deuterium, Tritium and isotopes of Helium and Lithium.

Bonding of the relatively immoble protons by electrons in closely associated orbitals would account for another mystery, “The Strong Force of Nuclear Bonding.”  Indeed, the geometry of nuclei may well account for the structure of the extra-nuclear orbital energy levels.

this model indicates that there is a probable continuity between the fields of chemistry and nuclear phusics and that many transformations previously overlooked may be possible.

2 Responses to Less Neutrons–Better Model?

chad

August 19th, 2005 at 8:51 am

What evidence exists to support this model?

Avatar

deanlsinclair

August 19th, 2005 at 5:57 pm

Actually, there is no evidence either for or against the existance of discrete neutrons in nuclei. That neutons have a finite existance outside of nuclei means nothing about their existance within.  The model considering them as existing there does account for the normal chemistry seen but so also does the model I propose which postulates a structore having what one may call intra-nuclear electronic levels.

 The thing is that, at least in my opinion, the “model” at this point is as theoretical as the usually accepted one and does offer an explanation for the two things which I mentioned.
An extension, not really mentioned above, to the idea of isonuclear isomerization among isonucleonic sets  (Sets having the same number of electrons and protons)  correlates a ton of data:  Neutron to electron plus proton,  K-capture, Gamma-emission decay ….

Incidentally, thanks for the tip you sent me a while back.  Haven’t had a chance to follow up on it, but shall try to.   Dean

Avatar

Comment Form

About

SciScoop Science News is a forum for news, views and controversial conjectures. Please contact us if would like to submit a guest post.

SciScoop Top Authors