New Evidence Supports Claim of Bubble Fusion Discoverer Rusi Taleyarkhan
Physics Monday, September 11, 2006 . This is a SciScoop post by StevenKrivit
Papers accepted by Physical Review Letters this past week show that the theoretical speculations by Brian Naranjo and Seth Putterman of UCLA, on which Reich/Nature based their assertions of “hot air” by Taleyarkhan do not match empirical examinations.
Options
Previously: « Sussing QM ain’t that easy!
- Next:#2 Brad Pad »
Comment Form
About
SciScoop Science News is a forum for news, views and controversial conjectures. Please contact us if would like to submit a guest post.
SciScoop Top Authors
- Total posts: 3177
- David Bradley (416)
- Bunyip (35)
- Chad (85)
- Drog (407)
- DV8 2XL (25)
- Wayne Goode (69)
- Gpmap (27)
- Ricky James (1367)
- Mertero (22)
- Mtigges (34)
- AP Smith (171)
- Sweetwind (64)
2 Responses to New Evidence Supports Claim of Bubble Fusion Discoverer Rusi Taleyarkhan
DV82XL
September 12th, 2006 at 2:47 pm
While I am no wild supported of cold fusion theories, I have been appalled at the spectacle of otherwise rational scientists falling over themselves to condemn any results in this area as fraud at worst and mistakes at best. Let the scientific method take its course and always keep a neutral mind.
erich knight
September 14th, 2006 at 1:31 am
My hat is off to the New Energy Times for pursuing, with such diligence, the controversy that has surrounded this fusion technology.
This is not “cold” fusion, as the previous commenter alluded, but seems to be a true low energy nuclear reaction.