<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Methane &#8211; The Other Greenhouse Gas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sciscoop.com/2007-3-30-65324-6571.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2007-3-30-65324-6571.html</link>
	<description>Scooping up science news and dropping it on your desk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DV82XL</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2007-3-30-65324-6571.html/comment-page-1#comment-2662</link>
		<dc:creator>DV82XL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 08:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=2942#comment-2662</guid>
		<description>I discussed in a previous article in this space &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciscoop.com/story/2007/3/27/14053/6647&quot;&gt;Dealing with Carbon&lt;/a&gt; some of the issues with carbon mitigation. I&#039;m not sure if wholesale tampering with poorly understood systems like the ocean is the best way to go. Humanity&#039;s record when tampering with Nature on such scales is spotty at best. &#160; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I discussed in a previous article in this space <a href="http://www.sciscoop.com/story/2007/3/27/14053/6647">Dealing with Carbon</a> some of the issues with carbon mitigation. I&#8217;m not sure if wholesale tampering with poorly understood systems like the ocean is the best way to go. Humanity&#8217;s record when tampering with Nature on such scales is spotty at best. &nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dobermanmacleod</title>
		<link>http://www.sciscoop.com/2007-3-30-65324-6571.html/comment-page-1#comment-1743</link>
		<dc:creator>dobermanmacleod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 02:24:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=2942#comment-1743</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;I praise the author of this article. &#160;Methane (CH4) has remained at a constant level in the atmosphere in the last couple of years (unlike CO2, which has jumped alarmingly). &#160;This year, SCIAMACHY instrument aboard ESA&#039;s Envisat produced the first satellite images of the global distribution of methane. &#160;If you run their animation showing monthly pictures from 2004 to 2007, it becomes clear that as the earth warms, methane concentrations over the cryosphere rapidly increase. &#160;Obviously, cronic emissions of methane from melting methane hydrate in permafrost will be a major contributor to global warming in the future.&lt;p&gt;
Much worse is the estimated 10,000 billion tons of methane under the oceans. &#160;A fraction of that is in shallow water deposits that are extremely susceptable to atmospheric temperature pulses. &#160;Furthermore, a underwater landslide or earthquake could release a tremendous amount of methane suddenly (a sudden release of less than 30 billion tons of methane would be like doubling the CO2 level of the air).&lt;p&gt;
The methane hydrate carbon reservior contains TWICE the carbon of all other fossil fuels, and it is ice, so will release the greenhouse gas when it melts, whereas conventional fossil fuels need to be burned to release their carbon store.&lt;p&gt;
It is important to know that the earth&#039;s methane hydrate reserves have melted before, triggered by an inbalance in the earth&#039;s carbon cycle (probably volcanic). &#160;This chain reaction has resulted in severe global warming episodes. &#160;Mankind&#039;s greenhouse gas emissions are about 30 times more than past triggers, and that means the chain reaction of melting methane hydrate will happen sooner, proceed faster, and therefore be much much more severe.&lt;p&gt;
In my opinion, since mankind is unlike to so severely cut their greenhouse gas emissions so fast as to avoid triggering runaway global warming, the only solution is to remove the CO2 from the air after it has been emitted.&lt;p&gt;
Nature already removes about half of mankind&#039;s CO2 emissions, but she is being overwhelmed. &#160;I suggest enhancing nature&#039;s ability to remove the CO2 from the air using genetic engineering. &#160;Perhaps seeding a GMO into the ocean.&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I praise the author of this article. &nbsp;Methane (CH4) has remained at a constant level in the atmosphere in the last couple of years (unlike CO2, which has jumped alarmingly). &nbsp;This year, SCIAMACHY instrument aboard ESA&#8217;s Envisat produced the first satellite images of the global distribution of methane. &nbsp;If you run their animation showing monthly pictures from 2004 to 2007, it becomes clear that as the earth warms, methane concentrations over the cryosphere rapidly increase. &nbsp;Obviously, cronic emissions of methane from melting methane hydrate in permafrost will be a major contributor to global warming in the future.
<p>
Much worse is the estimated 10,000 billion tons of methane under the oceans. &nbsp;A fraction of that is in shallow water deposits that are extremely susceptable to atmospheric temperature pulses. &nbsp;Furthermore, a underwater landslide or earthquake could release a tremendous amount of methane suddenly (a sudden release of less than 30 billion tons of methane would be like doubling the CO2 level of the air).</p>
<p>
The methane hydrate carbon reservior contains TWICE the carbon of all other fossil fuels, and it is ice, so will release the greenhouse gas when it melts, whereas conventional fossil fuels need to be burned to release their carbon store.</p>
<p>
It is important to know that the earth&#8217;s methane hydrate reserves have melted before, triggered by an inbalance in the earth&#8217;s carbon cycle (probably volcanic). &nbsp;This chain reaction has resulted in severe global warming episodes. &nbsp;Mankind&#8217;s greenhouse gas emissions are about 30 times more than past triggers, and that means the chain reaction of melting methane hydrate will happen sooner, proceed faster, and therefore be much much more severe.</p>
<p>
In my opinion, since mankind is unlike to so severely cut their greenhouse gas emissions so fast as to avoid triggering runaway global warming, the only solution is to remove the CO2 from the air after it has been emitted.</p>
<p>
Nature already removes about half of mankind&#8217;s CO2 emissions, but she is being overwhelmed. &nbsp;I suggest enhancing nature&#8217;s ability to remove the CO2 from the air using genetic engineering. &nbsp;Perhaps seeding a GMO into the ocean.</p>
<p></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
