http://www.sciscoop.com/2007-4-23-81554-6492.html Scooping up science news and dropping it on your desk Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:03:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.sciscoop.com/2007-4-23-81554-6492.html/comment-page-1#comment-1709 Teknowizard Wed, 20 Feb 2008 16:40:50 +0000 http://localhost/~arielschwartz/wordpress/sciscoop/?p=2956#comment-1709 This actually coincides with a theory (purely amature, I'm not a scientist) that I had in studying theories involving wormholes & white holes.  It struck me that in theory white holes are beyond the 2nd law of thermodynamics (if I'm remembering right) and taking into account the time travel concepts, that perhaps instead of a big bang that white holes could only occur in the beginning of the universe and that the matter & energy consumed by black holes is accelerated into the past.  In essence, the big bang being a series of white holes redistributing/releasing the energy/matter, thus it isn't destroyed or lost but rather redistributed in the past.  Kind of like Stephen Hawking's earlier theory but instead of a baby universe, travels in time to when our universe was a baby. This actually coincides with a theory (purely amature, I’m not a scientist) that I had in studying theories involving wormholes & white holes.  It struck me that in theory white holes are beyond the 2nd law of thermodynamics (if I’m remembering right) and taking into account the time travel concepts, that perhaps instead of a big bang that white holes could only occur in the beginning of the universe and that the matter & energy consumed by black holes is accelerated into the past.  In essence, the big bang being a series of white holes redistributing/releasing the energy/matter, thus it isn’t destroyed or lost but rather redistributed in the past.  Kind of like Stephen Hawking’s earlier theory but instead of a baby universe, travels in time to when our universe was a baby.

]]>