Medicine Friday, November 28, 2008 . This is a SciScoop post by FriendlyBacteria
Uptake of the childhood measles, mumps and rubella triple vaccine (MMR) declined sharply in the United Kingdom after a publication in medical journal The Lancet reported a link between the ‘triple jab’ and autism. Although the study was retracted after concerns about both its scientific validity and the authors’ sources of funding, many parents remained concerned and arguably ill-informed about the safety of the triple jab. This led to vaccination levels in the UK remaining well below the level required to achieve herd immunity.
If 95% of children are vaccinated, the chances of an epidemic of any of these three illnesses are considered minimal. However, around one in four British children have not received the two doses of the vaccine considered to provide adequate immunity. The percentage of non-vaccinated children can be even higher than this in certain parts of the country, notably in London. The UK Health Protection agency reported today that measles cases in England and Wales have reached a thirteen-year high, with over a thousand children falling ill between January and October of this year. The specter of a measles epidemic is now thought by epidemiologists to be looming on the horizon. If such an epidemic occurs, mutation of the virus as it spreads through the non-vaccinated cohort could allow it infect vaccinated individuals, rendering our existing defenses useless.
In the above-linked press release, Dr Mary Ramsay of the HPA reminded the public that “Children who weren’t vaccinated many years ago are at real risk. It is never too late to get vaccinated.” The same goes for adults who were not vaccinated in infancy.
While we cannot blame parents for wanting to protect their children from potential damaging side-effects of the MMR vaccine, perhaps we can blame media coverage and even poor public understanding of science for many parents’ decisions not to vaccinate. Perhaps we can also blame the complacency of a developed society which has forgotten the very real dangers of infectious disease. How many parents know that measles can lead to potentially fatal complications, or that mumps can render boys infertile? It remains to be seen what effect the current media coverage will have on vaccination levels.
Previously: « Holding Back the Sun
SciScoop Science News is a forum for news, views and controversial conjectures. Please contact us if would like to submit a guest post.
3 Responses to Fuse Shortens on Measles Timebomb
December 1st, 2008 at 3:51 am
As you know, there is NO link between the MMR jab and autism. However, some well-educated parents don’t find the herd immunity argument very strong in the face of the genuine side-effects of some vaccines. They ask: why should I protect the herd but risk serious side-effects for my child?
Yes, there are potentially debilitating effects of the three diseases (measles, mumps, rubella), no one wants to be afflicted, but the majority of people catching these diseases will not die from them nor end up infertile.
Just for the record, both my children had the MMR jab and both are fine.
FriendlyBacteria
December 2nd, 2008 at 4:11 am
Yes, one thing I find interesting in this debate is how you can view vaccination (in one respect) as a form of cooperation – herd immunity being a public good, potential side-effects being an individual-level cost.
December 2nd, 2008 at 5:01 am
I think it’s one aspect of the debate that is often overlooked by those promoting vaccination. They talk about herd immunity and public good, but forget that parents don’t want their little antelope to be the one ravaged by lions.