SciScoop Science News header image

A bone-crunching message from Simon Singh

science Friday, December 11, 2009 . This is a SciScoop post by David Bradley

  • Share/Bookmark

Simon Singh allegedly described the British Chiropractic Association as peddling “bogus” medicine given the claims of many of its members for being able to treat a whole range of diseases and disorders, including infant colic, ADHD, bed wetting, birth trauma, sporting injuries, and much more. There is a positive dearth of reliable, reproducible clinical evidence for such treatments, although anecdotally many chiropractors claim successes in treating a whole range of disorders.

The BCA sued Singh 18 months ago in England and in so doing has unleashed a revolution that could see English libel law changed beyond recognition to protect those who simply wish to discuss scientific matters in public without fear of legal action.

Just for the record, English law is not British law (Scotland has its own legal system). English libel laws are notoriously complicated and judgements hinge on hearsay, anecdote, and nonsense arguments and really do need revising to bring them kicking like a mule (actually an ass) into the 21st Century.

Anyway, here’s Singh’s open letter:

Dear Friends

It has been 18 months since I was sued for libel after publishing my article on chiropractic. I am continuing to fight my case and am prepared to defend my article for another 18 months or more if necessary. The ongoing libel case has been distracting, draining and frustrating, but it has always been heartening to receive so much support, particularly from people who realise that English libel laws need to be reformed in order to allow robust discussion of matters of public interest. Over twenty thousand people signed the statement to Keep Libel Laws out of Science, but now we need you to sign up again and add your name to the new statement.

The new statement is necessary because the campaign for libel reform is stepping up a gear and will be working on much broader base. Sense About Science has joined forces with Index on Censorship and English PEN and their goal is to reach 100,000 or more signatories in order to help politicians appreciate the level of public support for libel reform. We have already met several leading figures from all three main parties and they have all showed signs of interest. Now, however, we need a final push in order to persuade them to commit to libel reform.

Finally, I would like to make three points. First, I will stress again – please take the time to reinforce your support for libel reform by signing up at www.libelreform.org. Second, please spread the word by blogging, twittering, Facebooking and emailing in order to encourage friends, family and colleagues to sign up. Third, for those supporters who live overseas, please also add your name to the petition and encourage others to do the same; unfortunately and embarrassingly, English libel laws impact writers in the rest of the world [you can be sued in England in what's known as libel tourism], but now you can help change those laws by showing your support for libel reform. While I fight in my own libel battle, I hope that you will fight the bigger battle of libel reform.

Dr Simon Singh

3 Responses to A bone-crunching message from Simon Singh

Dr R. Kanji

December 12th, 2009 at 5:21 pm

Increasingly funding for research is dominated by corporate world or profiteering organisations outside the accountability of the public. Funding for research should be in the public domain. Tax the corporate world to fund research.

Once, research is in the public domain can the rigor of scientific questioning be guaranteed. This issue shows up that scientists( not only professionals) need to be organised in a systematic way to defend science. Individual scientists should have to go into battle alone.

Avatar

Todd Lloyd

December 14th, 2009 at 11:49 pm

Well, his article wasn’t exactly a research piece. It was full of hyperbole and opinion. He wrote an opinion piece, not a research paper. This isn’t science writing, especially if he didn’t do his homework on the subject.

Avatar

David Bradley

December 15th, 2009 at 7:31 am

It wasn’t an opinion piece anyway, it was an extract from the book he wrote with Edzard Ernst, which was in effect a meta analysis of years of literature studies. In it they come down on the side of several alternative remedies, including acupuncture for certain ailments and chiropractic for certain back problems, it’s the most bizarre claims for chiropractic efficacy with which they have an argument. Personally, I can see how the standard for clinical testing cannot work with chiropractic, but look at the mode of action practitioners claim and the basis on which it is supposed to work and it doesn’t stack up in most cases, although it’s not as ludicrous as the claims for the mechanism supposedly underlying homeopathy, of course.

Avatar

About

SciScoop Science News is a forum for news and views. Please contact us if you would like to submit a guest post. NO link-bait spam, thanks. Commenting is time-limited to the most recent posts, please keep comments on-topic, timely and spam-free.

SciScoop Top Authors