science Friday, July 16, 2010 . This is a SciScoop post by David Bradley
After months of oil spilling into the Gulf of Mexico following the fatal BP Deepwater Horizon accident (April 20, 2010), the company has at long last found a way to plug the leak. The cap was put in place earlier this week and valves were closed slowly on Thursday with a successful outcome.
US President Barack Obama has called the work a “positive sign” and the company’s shares jumped on the news (whoop-de-do!). All, I can say is, it was about bloody time and that BP was obviously not losing money at a high enough rate to warrant actually getting this problem fixed sooner.
The company now plans to siphon off around 80,000 barrels of oil a day on to tankers until a relief well is put in place to take the flow. The oilspill has been pouring out up to an estimated 2.5 million gallons of oil every day for three months, which despite the ineffectual use of booms and dispersants is likely to have an ecological and economic effect on the area for many, many years to come. Some livelihoods and much wildlife have been lost forever.
Reuters reports that cleanup over the next 15 years may cost BP up to $100 billion.

Previously: « Waterproof crops for sustainable food
SciScoop Science News is a forum for news and views. Please contact us if you would like to submit a guest post. NO link-bait spam, thanks. Commenting is time-limited to the most recent posts, please keep comments on-topic, timely and spam-free.
3 Responses to At last… oilspill stopped (for now)
phred14
July 16th, 2010 at 3:46 pm
They should have had contingency plans for this type of even before they even began drilling. They began figuring out what to do AFTER the disaster hit, and quite clearly have been thrashing about ever since then. When doing something dangerous or that could involve costly failure or cleanup, you should have contingency plans in place FIRST. It certainly appears that in the Deepwater Horizon case it’s not that they had plans in place that failed, it appears that they either had no contingency plans, or any such plans they had weren’t even in the ballpark needed.
David Bradley
July 16th, 2010 at 3:52 pm
@phred14 You’re almost certainly right, but it’s the same argument we have in the UK each year when we have heavy snow, they tell us there’s no point having lots of grit, salt and ploughs because we so rarely get heavy snow. They tell us that almost every year. BP’s argument might have been similar, rig explosions followed by major oil leaks are soooo rare there’s no point in wasting money on contingency ahead of such an event…how wrong is that?
David Bradley
July 23rd, 2010 at 9:43 am
UPDATE: 23rd July
Support ships are moving out ahead of the impending tropical storm.
BP is allegedly trying to foist contracts on the scientific experts it recruits into not publishing their data/findings on any involvement with the oilspill recovery.