Science News Forum - SciScoop
Home ¦ Join SciScoop ¦ Sections ¦ Categories ¦ Contact ¦ FAQ ¦ Links ¦ Sci-Art ¦ Coupons ¦ Search...

Now online: 14 Anonymous(s) and       SciScoop membership: 2980. Total stories since November 2002: 2718

Search SciScoop
 

Section Stories
The stories that didn't quite make it to the Front Page...

Lose Stomach Fat, Get Six Pack Abs
by sciencebase
Reviews::Medicine

Science Fair Projects E-Book Download
by sciencebase
Site News::Potpourri

Free Computer Information Resources
by sciencebase
News::Announcements

A simulator of catastrophe to improve the programming of autonomous robots of rescue
by engineering
Events::Robotics

Radioprotection by Plant Flavone
by cesarsed
News::Chemistry

G8+5: FEEL THE HEAT, ACT NOW! Quick! Quick! Quick!
by koantum
Events::Environment

ELN - Electronic Lab Notebooks - They're here now!
by midknightr
Reviews::Technology

The Universe: Smaller Than We Thought?
By apsmith, Section News
Posted on Wed Oct 08, 2003 at 10:04:45 AM PST

Astronomy In a Nature article this week, cosmologists Jeffrey Weeks, J.-P. Luminet and colleagues propose that correlations in the microwave background suggest an overall "dodecahedral" (3-dimensional 5-fold rotational symmetries) topology for the universe, in particular the form of a Poincaré dodecahedral space. Or as John Whitfield comments in Nature, and as also reported in the New York Times, the shape of a soccer ball, with opposite faces joined together, so that going out one side of the soccer ball you would come in the other. Only this soccer ball is about 60 billion light years across.

An infinite universe presents us with a number of perplexing problems - a recent Scientific American discussion covered many of them - effectively an infinite universe is equivalent to having many parallel universes, and having infinetely many copies of yourself out there doing slightly different things. But, on the other hand, a finite universe seems rather confining. Which makes the most sense? At least 60 billion light years is rather generous!

The Universe: Smaller Than We Thought? | 2 comments (2 topical, 0 hidden)

No limits (5.00 / 1) (#1)
by Sentinel on Sat Oct 11, 2003 at 12:27:54 PM PST
I think what DOESN'T make sense is when scientists place limits on The Universe.
Yes, we now know the Earth is in fact not flat. Amazing, isn't it?

If there is one thing scientists should stop doing, it is placing limits of any kind on The Universe. Never mind the "Multiverse".

 We are looking at the universe with limited technological capacities, limited conceptions and a seemingly generally accepted idea that the "theory of everything" is just around the corner.

Hardly...

I end with this quote which I absolutely agree with:
The universe is not only stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine.  -J. B. S. Haldane




Yes/No/Mu... (none / 0) (#2)
by Sweetwind on Wed Oct 15, 2003 at 04:28:43 AM PST
May I ask, did you read Godel, Escher, Bach recently? ;-)



The Universe: Smaller Than We Thought? | 2 comments (2 topical, 0 hidden)

Bookmark this story with del.icio.us Digg this story Furl this item Have you Reddit?

Login
Username:
Password:


Register Now Why join?

Add SciScoop to:

Subscribe to our partner Science Newsfeed for FREE Subscribe to our partner Science Newsfeed for FREE

Related Science Links
· Nature article
· Poincaré dodecahedral space
· John Whitfield
· New York Times
· recent Scientific American
· More on Astronomy
· Also by apsmith

All trademarks etc are owned by their respective companies
Comments are copyright individual "Poster" and opinions expressed are not necessarily those of individual members of the SciScoop Community. Site ©2002-2008 SciScoop.