Science News Forum - SciScoop
Home ¦ Join SciScoop ¦ Sections ¦ Categories ¦ Contact ¦ FAQ ¦ Links ¦ Sci-Art ¦ Search...

Now online: 14 Anonymous(s) and       SciScoop membership: 3157. Total stories since November 2002: 2728

Search SciScoop
 

Section Stories
The stories that didn't quite make it to the Front Page...

Lose Stomach Fat, Get Six Pack Abs
by sciencebase
Reviews::Medicine

Science Fair Projects E-Book Download
by sciencebase
Site News::Potpourri

Free Computer Information Resources
by sciencebase
News::Announcements

A simulator of catastrophe to improve the programming of autonomous robots of rescue
by engineering
Events::Robotics

Radioprotection by Plant Flavone
by cesarsed
News::Chemistry

G8+5: FEEL THE HEAT, ACT NOW! Quick! Quick! Quick!
by koantum
Events::Environment

ELN - Electronic Lab Notebooks - They're here now!
by midknightr
Reviews::Technology

Atomic Powered Global Hawk Jet Revving For Take-Off?
By rickyjames, Section News
Posted on Tue Jun 22, 2004 at 09:37:21 AM PST

Aerospace SciScoop covered this story over a year ago, but it's worth taking a look at again now because of new May 2004 cover stories in Popular Mechanics and Physics Today.  Apparently there are classified efforts underway to modify an existing Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a quantum nucleonic reactor (QNR) to power its jet engine, allowing virtually unlimited time aloft.  

QNRs are a totally new nuclear technology developed in the 1990s that use neither fission or fusion of atoms.  Instead, if you bombard the QNR fuel with X-rays from a standard hospital-type X-ray machine, the fuel gives off a stream of gamma rays that is 50 times more powerful and can directly heat a stream of air to push the aircraft forward.  Thus you're leveraging your available input power by a factor of fifty via a gizmo that produces no radioactive exhaust and can be throttled by controlling the X-ray generator.  Turn off the X-rays, you turn off the QNR.  Pretty neat if it works.  Not everybody believes it has, does or will. Regardless, Los Alamos and Sandia nuclear engineers in New Mexico have been instructed to discourage public discussion of QNRs even as the Department of Defense has put the machine on its Militarily Critical Technologies List to put it on the fast track for future funding.

The QNR fuel of choice is hafnium-178 (actually its metastable nuclear isomer, currently obtained by bombarding sub-hafnium elements with protons, neutrons and alpha particles), which has a half-life of only 30 years or so and isn't particularly dangerous - OK, OK, compared to plutonium in a conventional fission nuclear reactor.  No need to worry about a crash of a QNR Global Hawk; the crash site would clean itself up of any spilled radioactive material in a century or so! With a golfball-sized chunk of Hf-178m estimated as having the energy of ten kilotons of conventional explosives (half a Hiroshima), this technology is also a potential contender for a breakthrough Moon/Mars propulsion system.  Or a superbomb.  Or not.

Atomic Powered Global Hawk Jet Revving For Take-Off? | 10 comments (10 topical, 0 hidden)

wow (none / 0) (#1)
by mtigges on Tue Jun 22, 2004 at 06:12:07 AM PST
This is a pretty interesting story. I just wanted to point people to the metroactive link Ricky provides. It's an excellent article, don't skip it, read it.



  • Thanks! by rickyjames, 06/22/2004 07:32:27 AM PST (none / 0)
Putting the cart before the horse. ? (none / 0) (#2)
by barakn on Tue Jun 22, 2004 at 06:18:34 AM PST
They need to prove hafnium-178 can power a light bulb (or its own x-ray machine) before they start drawing up plans for hafnium-powered flight. I'm also puzzled how a guy who thinks the energy from hafnium can't be extracted still thinks it will trigger an arms race. Dud bombs are not very scary.



It won't be the first time... (none / 0) (#5)
by jxliv7 on Tue Jun 22, 2004 at 10:14:16 AM PST
.
...that the government has gone off half-cocked chasing something. I'm thinking in particular the huge numbers of proposed but never gotten past the prototype stage of aircraft. They've been doing that since before WWII (other things include air cars, a chicken in every pot, mass transit, free medical care for everyone, airport security, etc.).

The thing about half-life is that if you start out with X, in one half-life you have X/2 left, after another half-life it's X/4, and so on. Start out with a kilo of hafnium and in 300 years there will still be a gram left.

And a crash? I just don't think the site of a QNR UAV crash will be remembered in 300 years, not to mention 30. That's one bad thing about governments, owning up to things...

But if it works, great. I wouldn't want to caught in the exhaust of one of those QNR UAVs, but that's another concern.

jon




jon



  • Maybe by barakn, 06/23/2004 04:25:03 PM PST (none / 0)
It's a little late but (none / 0) (#6)
by barakn on Tue Jun 22, 2004 at 07:46:11 PM PST
the title should contain the word 'revving', not 'reving'.



Hafnium (none / 0) (#10)
by Anonymous on Mon May 16, 2005 at 04:22:55 PM PST
Hafnium itself isnt dangerous in its stable state. The half life is 30 years, but the radiation is minimal. I forget the URL, but do a quick google search for hafnium and youll find a thing on the health effects. If you get it in your eyes, it makes them a bit itchy, but other than that its totally benign.



Atomic Powered Global Hawk Jet Revving For Take-Off? | 10 comments (10 topical, 0 hidden)

Bookmark this story with del.icio.us Digg this story Furl this item Have you Reddit?

Login
Username:
Password:


Register Now Why join?

Add SciScoop to:

Subscribe to our partner Science Newsfeed for FREE Subscribe to our partner Science Newsfeed for FREE

Related Science Links
· Scoop
· SciScoop covered this story over a year ago
· Popular Mechanics
· Physics Today
· Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)
· quantum nucleonic reactor (QNR)
· Not everybody believes it has, does or will
· Militarily Critical Technologies List
· hafnium-17 8
· metastable nuclear isomer
· bombarding sub-hafnium elements with protons, neutrons and alpha particles
· breakthrou gh Moon/Mars propulsion system
· a superbomb
· not
· More on Aerospace
· Also by rickyjames

All trademarks etc are owned by their respective companies
Comments are copyright individual "Poster" and opinions expressed are not necessarily those of individual members of the SciScoop Community. Site ©2002-2008 SciScoop.