Science News Forum - SciScoop
Home ¦ Join SciScoop ¦ Sections ¦ Categories ¦ Contact ¦ FAQ ¦ Links ¦ Sci-Art ¦ Search...

Now online: 19 Anonymous(s) and       SciScoop membership: 3784. Total stories since November 2002: 2796

Search SciScoop
 

Section Stories
The stories that didn't quite make it to the Front Page...

A Constant's Secrets. A Different Look at Planck's Constant
by deanlsinclair
Commentary::Physics

Everspin release new MRAM products for Consumer Applications
by mertero
News::Technology

No Flash for Seagate Moving to Next-gen Memory Direct
by mertero
News::Technology

GE shows a glimpse into the future of lighting [OLEDs]
by mertero
News::Environment

Lose Stomach Fat, Get Six Pack Abs
by sciencebase
Reviews::Medicine

Science Fair Projects E-Book Download
by sciencebase
Site News::Potpourri

Free Computer Information Resources
by sciencebase
News::Announcements

Book Your Orbital Vacations Now!
By apsmith, Section News
Posted on Thu Jul 08, 2004 at 03:46:28 PM PST

Aerospace A news report from Las Vegas, home of Bigelow Aerospace, describes revolutionary new designs for inflatable space stations which will be far lower in cost than the ISS - 2 modules will have more room than ISS for just $200 million. And a transformed NASA is very interested! The project is the brainchild of Nevada billionaire Robert Bigelow, who has some experience with low-cost hotel chains.

Read on for some quotes from Bigelow on why his company can do things so much more cheaply...

When Bigelow's engineers told him they needed a high-tech valve that would serve as a key component of the life support system on board the inflatable modules, Bigelow went shopping. American aerospace giants were willing to sell him the valve at costs that ranged from $300,000 to $1 million. Bigelow found and purchased the same valve from a European company. The cost for the identical valve? A mere $5,000.

"This is pretty typical of what's wrong with the American aerospace industry and with American companies in general," Bigelow says. "Whether it's steel or automobiles or textiles, Americans have priced themselves out of the world market. Now our dominance in space technology has evaporated as well. We don't have a space shuttle or a space plane, and our American launchers are simply not affordable for the delivery of any large systems."

While rumors about their work have been floating around for some time now, this is the first lengthy report I've seen on what they're doing, and it sounds like they'll be fully open for business later this year.

It really is turning into a great year for space!

Book Your Orbital Vacations Now! | 13 comments (13 topical, 0 hidden)

Great Idea, But... (5.00 / 1) (#1)
by rickyjames on Fri Jul 09, 2004 at 03:08:07 AM PST
I've always thought inflatables were the way to go, particularly on a long-duration mission like a trip to Mars.   We looked at these things when I was at Boeing on Space Station, and in fact there was a period of about 6 months where we kind of thought NASA Houston was going to change directions on us and replace Boeing modules with an inflatable design by somebody else...maybe this guy.

Here's the problem: orbital debris.  For example, before Challenger was destroyed, one of it's windows was hit by a paint fleck the size of a postage stamp that left a pit a quarter inch deep in the glass - it was like getting hit by a bowling ball going 60 MPH.  That was by no means unique - NASA has had to replace just the windows on the Shuttle over 50 times.  As a result, the Space Station has a HUGE mass investment in debris impact shielding.  Talk about gold plating - it's not actually MADE of gold, but by the time you figure in the launch costs, it might as well be...

So inflatables have two big gotchas.  Sure, the astronauts want high-school-gym size rooms to soar around in that inflatables could easily give them.  Unfortunately, a big inflatable room is a MUCH bigger target to get hit by space debris than a nice, cramped compact module.  We just can't afford to launch the shielding mass required to protect them from punctures.  

Also, the mass required by the shielding for an inflatable is just the beginning.  Then you gotta fill it with air.  Air is heavy.  Air has to be lifted from the surface of the Earth at $10,000 per pound.  Elbow room and soaring overhead expances for astronauts cost A LOT in air mass.  By current NASA rules, whatever the air requirement is, double it - you have to prepare for a puncture-and-evacuate contingency with complete decompression before repair begins.  Thus you have to have a complete change of air, stored in high pressure tanks that are themselves a very heavy and dangerous subsystem in space.  You have no idea how many hours I've wasted sitting in meetings arguing over the relative safety merits of various emergency repressurization systems - NASA will not leave home without them, but they sure don't like them, and for good reasons.  If one of those high pressure tanks ever gets holed by space debris...well, the sudden uncontrolled disintegration of a pressure tank is the definition of a fragmentation bomb.  

I also think inevitable catastrophic debris strikes are the one thing that will make an otherwise promising space elevator idea ultimately infeasible.  However, I still think we'll one day see inflatable use on interplanetary trips when we can get out of the flying garbage dump we've made low Earth orbit.

Enjoy reading this SciScoop story? Here's a thousand more.




  • And For The Record... by rickyjames, 07/09/2004 03:24:53 AM PST (5.00 / 1)
    • Volume by apsmith, 07/09/2004 05:33:09 AM PST (5.00 / 1)
  • shielding by janra, 07/09/2004 10:28:40 AM PST (5.00 / 1)
And shielding proportional to area (none / 0) (#4)
by apsmith on Fri Jul 09, 2004 at 05:34:26 AM PST
- so of course the larger your linear dimension, the LESS shielding mass you need, relative to the overall structural mass of the station.


Join us at the National Space Society and help open space to everyone!


Book Your Orbital Vacations Now! | 13 comments (13 topical, 0 hidden)

Bookmark this story with del.icio.us Digg this story Furl this item Have you Reddit?

Login
Username:
Password:


Register Now Why join?

SciScoop Support

Related Science Links
· news report
· Bigelow Aerospace,
· transforme d NASA
· some experience with low-cost hotel chains
· More on Aerospace
· Also by apsmith

All trademarks etc are owned by their respective companies
Comments are copyright individual "Poster" and opinions expressed are not necessarily those of individual members of the SciScoop Community. Site ©2002-2008 SciScoop.