Science News Forum - SciScoop
Home ¦ Join SciScoop ¦ Sections ¦ Categories ¦ Contact ¦ FAQ ¦ Links ¦ Sci-Art ¦ Search...

Now online: 13 Anonymous(s) and       SciScoop membership: 3517. Total stories since November 2002: 2752

Search SciScoop
 

Section Stories
The stories that didn't quite make it to the Front Page...

GE shows a glimpse into the future of lighting [OLEDs]
by mertero
News::Environment

Lose Stomach Fat, Get Six Pack Abs
by sciencebase
Reviews::Medicine

Science Fair Projects E-Book Download
by sciencebase
Site News::Potpourri

Free Computer Information Resources
by sciencebase
News::Announcements

A simulator of catastrophe to improve the programming of autonomous robots of rescue
by engineering
Events::Robotics

Radioprotection by Plant Flavone
by cesarsed
News::Chemistry

G8+5: FEEL THE HEAT, ACT NOW! Quick! Quick! Quick!
by koantum
Events::Environment

Use It Or Lose It...
By janra, Section News
Posted on Mon Aug 23, 2004 at 05:18:24 AM PST

Cognitive Science From the most basic sounds to language as a whole, we only have the ability to recognize and use those linguistic features to which we are exposed regularly.

And it seems this also applies to concepts, including mathematics.

The Pirahã, a small tribe in the Amazon, do not have words in their language for numbers, counting, or numeric comparisons. "One", "two", and "many" are all they know, and even those aren't as concrete as they were translated here - the word translated as "one" actually means "approximately one" or "a small amount", for example. Because of this linguistic lack, they have a very hard time recognizing and remembering a number of objects higher than about three.

Peter Gordon of Columbia University studied the Pirahã and found that they had great difficulty when asked to work with numerous objects. The Pirahã are by no means retarded, however: they have excellent capabilities in other areas such as spatial orientation and linguistics, and clearly understood the task they were asked to do. In this case, the lack of specific words for numbers higher than two made it difficult for them to think about numbers higher than two or three. Even after some of the adults requested math lessons they still couldn't learn even the most basic mathematical concepts.

Whether or not - and to what extent - our language affects how we think has been debated for over a century. This new research adds another piece of evidence to that argument, as well as to the idea that concepts for which we have no words are harder to think about. This has been seen in other places as well: the Zuni indians, for example, use the same word for orange as for yellow. While they can see the difference between the two colours, they are less likely to remember if a particular object was orange or yellow after a period of time than an English speaker, who codifies the difference between the two colours in the language, does.

Use It Or Lose It... | 5 comments (5 topical, 0 hidden)

Fascinating... (4.00 / 2) (#1)
by kryptothesuperdog on Mon Aug 23, 2004 at 12:42:27 AM PST
Just to say that I recently read Steven Pinker's How The Mind Works which goes into detail on the relation of language and thought. I found the book absolutely fascinating (second only to The Blind Watchmaker in terms of exclaim-out-loud information) and would thoroughly recommend it to anyone interested in the mind, especially if, like me, you have little existing knowledge of cognitive science.



Or Vice Versa? (4.00 / 2) (#4)
by Anonymous on Tue Aug 24, 2004 at 04:48:01 AM PST
Perhaps their language doesn't accomodate higher numbers because they have always had a genetic predisposition to not being able to remember higher numbers? Maybe their language reflects their latent (dis)abilities rather than causes them.



janra (2.00 / 2) (#2)
by BigZaphod on Mon Aug 23, 2004 at 06:19:25 AM PST
This is entirely off topic..  but wow..  I swear we follow each other around the web janra..  :-)  I see you everywhere I go from K5 and now here.  It's a small web, apparently...



Bad title. (2.00 / 1) (#3)
by Anonymous on Mon Aug 23, 2004 at 11:40:07 AM PST
I read this site occasionally through RSS, and nearly didn't pick this one up due to a crappy title. A better title would be "Language: Use it or Lose it"



Use It Or Lose It... | 5 comments (5 topical, 0 hidden)

Bookmark this story with del.icio.us Digg this story Furl this item Have you Reddit?

Login
Username:
Password:


Register Now Why join?

Add SciScoop to:

Subscribe to our partner Science Newsfeed for FREE Subscribe to our partner Science Newsfeed for FREE

Related Science Links
· the most basic sounds
· language as a whole
· including mathematics
· Peter Gordon
· debated for over a century
· More on Cognitive Science
· Also by janra

All trademarks etc are owned by their respective companies
Comments are copyright individual "Poster" and opinions expressed are not necessarily those of individual members of the SciScoop Community. Site ©2002-2008 SciScoop.