Science News Forum - SciScoop
Home ¦ Join SciScoop ¦ Sections ¦ Categories ¦ Contact ¦ FAQ ¦ Links ¦ Sci-Art ¦ Search...

Now online: 12 Anonymous(s) and       SciScoop membership: 3666. Total stories since November 2002: 2769

Search SciScoop
 

Section Stories
The stories that didn't quite make it to the Front Page...

Educators beware!
by bear
Events::Announcements

GE shows a glimpse into the future of lighting [OLEDs]
by mertero
News::Environment

Lose Stomach Fat, Get Six Pack Abs
by sciencebase
Reviews::Medicine

Science Fair Projects E-Book Download
by sciencebase
Site News::Potpourri

Free Computer Information Resources
by sciencebase
News::Announcements

A simulator of catastrophe to improve the programming of autonomous robots of rescue
by engineering
Events::Robotics

Radioprotection by Plant Flavone
by cesarsed
News::Chemistry

Why not correct Pi instead of its precision
By LogicallyGenius, Section Ask SciScoop
Posted on Wed Dec 21, 2005 at 02:31:01 AM PST

Mathematics Many a times we hear latest precise value of Pi, upto a million digits or so. But no one cares to find the actual precise Pi ratio, 22/7. 22/7 is a very old value http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Pi. So why isnt anyone interested in measuring diameter to circumference ratio of Pi using nano scales?

Why not correct Pi instead of its precision | 3 comments (3 topical, 0 hidden)

Some Clarifications (5.00 / 1) (#2)
by chad on Sat Dec 24, 2005 at 08:32:51 AM PST

An irrational number is one that does not have a last digit. It's not a matter of finding the last digit; rather, mathemeticians have proven that the number of digits continues to infinity without ever ending or turning into a repeating pattern. Another popular irrational number is √2 (if I recall correctly, any square root of a whole number that does not resolve to a whole number is irrational—so √5 and √7 are irrational, while √4 and √9 are not).

Thus, we can approximate the value of pi. "3" is one such approximation and 22/7 is another. But we can never define π exactly—which is why we use a symbol (Π) instead of a numeric value.

On that same note, no physical circle is ever perfectly round in a mathematical sense. There is always some (possibly very small) error that turns the ratio between the circumference and the diameter into a non-irrational number. Even if you made the circle very, very precise, you would not be able to refine it past a certain point because of quantum limits. There is a specific size/energy limit beyond which we cannot go any smaller. Quantum theory tells us that the real world is digital, not analog, but that the sampling rate is so extremely high that it appears to be analog. Mathematics, on the other hand, is not limited by the physical universe and can easily handle an analog world with irrational, infinite numbers.


-----------------------
Check out Chad's News
-----------------------




Pi is an irrational number (none / 0) (#1)
by DV82XL on Wed Dec 21, 2005 at 12:09:08 PM PST
An irrational number is a number that cannot be expressed as a fraction n/m for any integers n and m.

No degree of precision of measurement will ever yield an exact ratio.



Why not correct Pi instead of its precision | 3 comments (3 topical, 0 hidden)

Bookmark this story with del.icio.us Digg this story Furl this item Have you Reddit?

Login
Username:
Password:


Register Now Why join?

SciScoop Support

Related Science Links
· http://en. wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Pi
· More on Mathematics
· Also by LogicallyGenius

All trademarks etc are owned by their respective companies
Comments are copyright individual "Poster" and opinions expressed are not necessarily those of individual members of the SciScoop Community. Site ©2002-2008 SciScoop.